Philip Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is faster to reproduce with a smaller block size. > I haven't looked in detail to find the cause, but I did notice that > neigh_seq_start() does a pos_minus_one adjustment, and neigh_seq_next() > does not.
Yeah I can reproduce this now. I think you actually sent me the instructions before but I didn't get around to testing it. Sorry about that. I'll look into this. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
