From: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:04:34 +0200
> On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 11:44 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > > > Thinking it over I'm still not completely happy with this. A > > small subset of all the validation tasks is simply too complex > > to be put into the policy. The validation of your type value > > array is such a case, address fields with variable length based > > on their family is another. I think it's just not worth to > > blow up struct nla_policy by 12 bytes per entry just to save > > some code. > > Alright, I can instead just add the validation function call wherever > that attribute is going to be used. Just thought it might be nice to > have this generically, I'm not really too attached to it :) > > I'll change it in the next nl80211 iteration. Thanks Johannes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
