On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:51:22PM -0700, Nikita V. Shirokov wrote:
> Adding new bpf helper which would allow us to manipulate
> xdp's data_end pointer, and allow us to reduce packet's size
> indended use case: to generate ICMP messages from XDP context,
> where such message would contain truncated original packet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikita V. Shirokov <tehn...@tehnerd.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 10 +++++++++-
> net/core/filter.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index c5ec89732a8d..9a2d1a04eb24 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -755,6 +755,13 @@ union bpf_attr {
> * @addr: pointer to struct sockaddr to bind socket to
> * @addr_len: length of sockaddr structure
> * Return: 0 on success or negative error code
> + *
> + * int bpf_xdp_adjust_tail(xdp_md, delta)
> + * Adjust the xdp_md.data_end by delta. Only shrinking of packet's
> + * size is supported.
> + * @xdp_md: pointer to xdp_md
> + * @delta: A negative integer to be added to xdp_md.data_end
> + * Return: 0 on success or negative on error
> */
> #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN) \
> FN(unspec), \
> @@ -821,7 +828,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
> FN(msg_apply_bytes), \
> FN(msg_cork_bytes), \
> FN(msg_pull_data), \
> - FN(bind),
> + FN(bind), \
> + FN(xdp_adjust_tail),
>
> /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
> * function eBPF program intends to call
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index d31aff93270d..6c8ac7b548d6 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -2717,6 +2717,30 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto
> bpf_xdp_adjust_head_proto = {
> .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
> };
>
> +BPF_CALL_2(bpf_xdp_adjust_tail, struct xdp_buff *, xdp, int, offset)
> +{
> + /* only shrinking is allowed for now. */
> + if (unlikely(offset > 0))
> + return -EINVAL;
why allow offset == 0 ?
It's a nop. xdp_adjust_head allows it, but it's not a reason
to repeat the same here.
Like we may decide to do something with offset==0 in the future.
Let's keep it reserved.
In the subject please replace
[bpf]: adding bpf_xdp_adjust_tail helper
with
bpf: adding bpf_xdp_adjust_tail helper
"[bpf] foo bar" subject used to be llvm patch convention,
but lately we switched it to kernel style as well with "bpf: foo bar"
