----- On Mar 28, 2018, at 3:38 PM, rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:32:20 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
>> -#define __DO_TRACE(tp, proto, args, cond, rcucheck)                 \
>> +#define __DO_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, rcucheck)                       
>> \
>>      do {                                                            \
>>              struct tracepoint_func *it_func_ptr;                    \
>>              void *it_func;                                          \
>> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ extern void syscall_unregfunc(void);
>>              if (rcucheck)                                           \
>>                      rcu_irq_enter_irqson();                         \
>>              rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace();                          \
>> -            it_func_ptr = rcu_dereference_sched((tp)->funcs);       \
>> +            it_func_ptr = rcu_dereference_sched(__trace_##name##_funcs); \
> 
> What we lose in data size, we may make up for in text (which is even
> more important). This will remove a dereference in the hot path.
> 
> I'll make a few builds and run size on the vmlinux images to see how
> this pans out.

I like the approach. If it passes testing, I think it's a valuable improvement
to lessen cache footprint of tracepoint when tracing is active.

Thanks!

Mathieu


> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
>>              if (it_func_ptr) {                                      \
> >                     do {                                            \

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

Reply via email to