On 3/27/2018 10:38 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> We are being told that if you use writel(), then you don't need a wmb() on >> all architectures. > I'm not sure who told you that but that is incorrect, at least for > x86. If you attempt to use writel() without the wmb() we will have to > NAK the patches. We will accept the wmb() with writel_releaxed() since > that solves things for ARM. >
I added netdev and you to the RFC on writel and writel_relaxed list. Feel free to raise your concerns. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
