From: Yury Norov <yno...@caviumnetworks.com> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 19:26:23 +0300
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 11:17:36AM -0500, David Miller wrote: >> From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com> >> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 07:21:32 +0100 >> >> > Recently ethtool started to give incomplete values for supported and >> > advertised modes. There seems to be a regression in this commit: >> > The bit number parameter in the calls to bitmap_to_arr32() in >> > store_link_ksettings_for_user() should be __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS >> > instead of __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32. >> > >> > After having changed this ethtool behaves normally again. >> >> I do not see the commit with the SHA1 ID from the Subject line in >> either Linus's nor my networking tree. >> >> Where is that change? > > It's in next-20180202. Hmmm, then the fix should probably go into whatever tree that commit ultimately came from.
