On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > In be_cmd_txq_create() we have > if (req->hdr.version > 0) > req->if_id = cpu_to_le16(adapter->if_handle); > req->num_pages = PAGES_4K_SPANNED(q_mem->va, q_mem->size); > req->ulp_num = BE_ULP1_NUM; > req->type = BE_ETH_TX_RING_TYPE_STANDARD; > req->cq_id = cpu_to_le16(cq->id); > req->queue_size = be_encoded_q_len(txq->len); > be_cmd_page_addrs_prepare(req->pages, ARRAY_SIZE(req->pages), q_mem); > ver = req->hdr.version; > ... > > Everything appears to be consistent with little-endian data - direct > assignments to u8 fields, cpu_to_le16 for cq_id and if_id, phys_addr > array is also filled with little-endian data, so's ->hdr (several > lines prior, by be_wrb_cmd_hdr_prepare()). > > The only exception is > req->type = BE_ETH_TX_RING_TYPE_STANDARD; > where we set a 16bit field with host-endian constant (2). > .. > > So it really smells like this line should've been > req->type = cpu_to_le16(BE_ETH_TX_RING_TYPE_STANDARD); > Sorry for replying late...I missed this mail. I guess the old @emulex.com email ids don't work anymore -- it's @broadcom.com now! Yes, this does look like a bug; we'll send a patch to fix this.
Thanks!