On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 01:59:06PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 03:26:31PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Based on the previous discussion this enables passing a IFLA_IF_NETNSID > > property along with RTM_SETLINK and RTM_DELLINK requests. The patch for > > RTM_NEWLINK will be sent out in a separate patch since there are more > > corner-cases to think about. > > > > Best, > > Christian > > > > Changelog 2018-01-24: > > * Preserve old behavior and report -ENODEV when either ifindex or ifname is > > provided and IFLA_GROUP is set. Spotted by Wolfgang Bumiller. > > > > Christian Brauner (3): > > rtnetlink: enable IFLA_IF_NETNSID in do_setlink() > > rtnetlink: enable IFLA_IF_NETNSID for RTM_SETLINK > > rtnetlink: enable IFLA_IF_NETNSID for RTM_DELLINK > > > > net/core/rtnetlink.c | 96 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > > 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.14.1 > > > > I've done more testing around enabling IFLA_IF_NETNSID for RTM_NEWLINK > as well and I think that the change is actually trivial. However, I > would like to wait before sending this patch out until we have agreed on > the patches for RTM_SETLINK and RTM_DELLINK in this series. Once we have > merged those I can just send another small commit. Or - if changes to > this patch series are required - I can just add it in a v2.
Jiri, do you want that patch resent with the small commit for RTM_NEWLINK included or are you fine with sending it after this series? Thanks! Christian
