On 2018/1/9 6:47, Shannon Nelson wrote:
Add unlikely() to a few error checking expressions in the Tx
offload handling.
Suggested-by: Yanjun Zhu <yanjun....@oracle.com>
Hi,
I am fine with this patch. I have a question. The ipsec feature is
supported in ixgbevf?
Thanks a lot.
Zhu Yanjun
Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nel...@oracle.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c
index 57c10e6..3d069a2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c
@@ -749,28 +749,28 @@ int ixgbe_ipsec_tx(struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring,
struct xfrm_state *xs;
struct tx_sa *tsa;
- if (!first->skb->sp->len) {
+ if (unlikely(!first->skb->sp->len)) {
netdev_err(tx_ring->netdev, "%s: no xfrm state len = %d\n",
__func__, first->skb->sp->len);
return 0;
}
xs = xfrm_input_state(first->skb);
- if (!xs) {
+ if (unlikely(!xs)) {
netdev_err(tx_ring->netdev, "%s: no xfrm_input_state() xs =
%p\n",
__func__, xs);
return 0;
}
itd->sa_idx = xs->xso.offload_handle - IXGBE_IPSEC_BASE_TX_INDEX;
- if (itd->sa_idx > IXGBE_IPSEC_MAX_SA_COUNT) {
+ if (unlikely(itd->sa_idx > IXGBE_IPSEC_MAX_SA_COUNT)) {
netdev_err(tx_ring->netdev, "%s: bad sa_idx=%d handle=%lu\n",
__func__, itd->sa_idx, xs->xso.offload_handle);
return 0;
}
tsa = &ipsec->tx_tbl[itd->sa_idx];
- if (!tsa->used) {
+ if (unlikely(!tsa->used)) {
netdev_err(tx_ring->netdev, "%s: unused sa_idx=%d\n",
__func__, itd->sa_idx);
return 0;