James Morris wrote: > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Venkat Yekkirala wrote: >>>I like these changes, but wondering why you haven't supplied >>>code for the >>>outbound case ? >> >>The code for the outbound is still in the works. I hope to have it >>out in a week or so. > > Ok, I guess we should wait until then before incorporating the patches > (also, for Paul Moore to return and comment re. CIPSO).
My main concern with these patches is that moving the NetLabel check out of selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb() and into selinux_skb_policy_check() (as it is currently written) would force us to compare a packet's NetLabel with either the IPsec label or the secmark label and not the socket's label. The ability to make access decisions based on the process consuming the data and the data itself it one of the nicer qualities of NetLabel in my opinion. Like James, I'd also like to see the outbound side too. -- paul moore linux security @ hp - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
