On 01/08/2018 10:13 PM, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
From: Andy Gospodarek <go...@broadcom.com>

Change all appropriate mlx5_am* and MLX5_AM* references to net_dim and
NET_DIM, respectively, in code that handles dynamic interrupt
moderation.  Also change all references from 'am' to 'dim' when used as
local variables and add generic profile references.

Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek <go...@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Tal Gilboa <ta...@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed <sae...@mellanox.com>
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en.h       |   9 +-
  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_dim.c   |  14 +-
  .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c   |   6 +-
  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c  |  40 ++-
  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_txrx.c  |   8 +-
  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/net_dim.c  | 286 ++++++++++-----------
  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/net_dim.h  |  63 ++---
  7 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 201 deletions(-)


[...]

#define IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF(val, ref) \
        (((100 * abs((val) - (ref))) / (ref)) > 10) /* more than 10% difference 
*/
-static int mlx5e_am_stats_compare(struct mlx5e_rx_am_stats *curr,
-                                 struct mlx5e_rx_am_stats *prev)
+static int net_dim_stats_compare(struct net_dim_stats *curr,
+                                struct net_dim_stats *prev)
  {
        if (!prev->bpms)
-               return curr->bpms ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER :
-                                   MLX5E_AM_STATS_SAME;
+               return curr->bpms ? NET_DIM_STATS_BETTER :
+                                   NET_DIM_STATS_SAME;
if (IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF(curr->bpms, prev->bpms))
-               return (curr->bpms > prev->bpms) ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER :
-                                                  MLX5E_AM_STATS_WORSE;
+               return (curr->bpms > prev->bpms) ? NET_DIM_STATS_BETTER :
+                                                  NET_DIM_STATS_WORSE;

Hey Andy,

I am currently reviewing a patch internally that fixes a bug in this area, prev->ppms can be 0 and could cause IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF ouch ! same goes for prev->eppm, for some reason we had a broken assumption that if ppms is 0 for some reason then the bpms is 0 and the above condition will cover us.

Anyway the patch will go to net, which means when this series gets accepted then net-next will fail to merge with net and we need to manually push the fix to the new DIM library.

But for now I don't think anything is required for this series other than bringing this division by 0 issue and the future merge conflict to your attention.

        if (IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF(curr->ppms, prev->ppms))
-               return (curr->ppms > prev->ppms) ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER :
-                                                  MLX5E_AM_STATS_WORSE;
+               return (curr->ppms > prev->ppms) ? NET_DIM_STATS_BETTER :
+                                                  NET_DIM_STATS_WORSE;
if (IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF(curr->epms, prev->epms))
-               return (curr->epms < prev->epms) ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER :
-                                                  MLX5E_AM_STATS_WORSE;
+               return (curr->epms < prev->epms) ? NET_DIM_STATS_BETTER :
+                                                  NET_DIM_STATS_WORSE;
- return MLX5E_AM_STATS_SAME;
+       return NET_DIM_STATS_SAME;
  }

Reply via email to