On 12/31/17 9:15 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > IPv4 and IPv6 react differently to a netdev being unregistered. In IPv4, > in case the netdev is used as a nexthop device in a multipath route, the > entire route is flushed. > > However, IPv6 only removes the nexthops associated with the unregistered > netdev. > > Align IPv4 and IPv6 and flush all the sibling routes when a nexthop > device is unregistered. > > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> > --- > net/ipv6/route.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
not so sure about this one. When we get to nexthops as separate objects, we can bring in consistency by allowing ipv4 routes to just drop a single nexthop in the route versus the behavior today.
