Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 07:17:50PM CET, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote: >On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kubak...@wp.pl> wrote: >> Ah, no object debug but KASAN on produces this: >> > > >I bet it is an ingress qdisc which is being freed? > > > >> [ 39.268209] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in cpu_needs_another_gp+0x246/0x2b0 >> [ 39.275965] Read of size 8 at addr ffff8803aa64f138 by task swapper/13/0 >> [ 39.283524] >> [ 39.285256] CPU: 13 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/13 Not tainted >> 4.15.0-rc3-perf-00955-g1d0b01347dd5-dirty #8 >> [ 39.295535] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/072T6D, BIOS 2.3.4 >> 11/08/2016 >> [ 39.303969] Call Trace: >> [ 39.306769] <IRQ> >> [ 39.309088] dump_stack+0xa6/0x118 >> [ 39.312957] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0xe8/0xe8 >> [ 39.317895] ? cpu_needs_another_gp+0x246/0x2b0 >> [ 39.323030] print_address_description+0x6a/0x270 >> [ 39.328380] ? cpu_needs_another_gp+0x246/0x2b0 >> [ 39.333510] kasan_report+0x23f/0x350 >> [ 39.337672] cpu_needs_another_gp+0x246/0x2b0 >> ... >> [ 39.383026] rcu_process_callbacks+0x1a0/0x620 >> ... > > >This is confusing. > >I guess it is q->miniqp which is freed in qdisc_graft() without properly >waiting for rcu readers?
miniqp is inside qdisc private data: struct ingress_sched_data { struct tcf_block *block; struct tcf_block_ext_info block_info; struct mini_Qdisc_pair miniqp; }; That is freed along with the qdisc itself in: qdisc_destroy->qdisc_free Before miniq, tp was checked in the rcu reader path. In case it was not null, q was processed. In slow patch, tp is freed after rcu grace period: tcf_proto_destroy->kfree_rcu I assumed that since q is processed in rcu reader, it is also freed after a grace period, but now looking at the code I don't see it happening like that. So I think that change to miniq made the existing race window a bit wider and easier to hit. I believe that calling kfree_rcu by call_rcu should resolve this.