From: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvara...@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:37:14 -0800
> How would you want us to fix this issue? Is doing an ioread on > fetch_index for every poll our only option? (to get head and tail > point once) > > If 256 is not reasonable, will wq_budget equal to wq ring size be > acceptable? > At any point number of wq entries to be cleaned cannot be more than > ring size. You can resubmit your orignal patch to increase things to 256 but realize that I still consider this driver terrible at layering, indirection, and how it does reclaim.
