On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 07:32:21AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: > I think we might want even more description here. Specifically why > reversing the order allows local to be destroyed before main. I was > thinking something along the lines of: > > Destroy the tables in reverse order to guarantee that the local table, > ID 255, is destroyed before main table, ID 254. This is necessary as > local may contain references to data contained in main.
Sent v3: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/851564/ Thanks
