2017-12-14 22:28 GMT+01:00 Daniele Palmas <dnl...@gmail.com>: > 2017-12-14 18:55 GMT+01:00 Bjørn Mork <bj...@mork.no>: >> Daniele Palmas <dnl...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> This patch adds support for Telit ME910 PID 0x1101. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniele Palmas <dnl...@gmail.com> >> >> Acked-by: Bjørn Mork <bj...@mork.no> >> >>> bInterfaceSubClass 254 >> >> Just curious: Is there some meaning hidden here? >> > > That was puzzling also for me, so I checked the original QC > composition and had the same value. None of the documents I have has a > reference to this. > > As far as I know, from the functional point of view, it is a normal AT > command port like the other one. But I'll try to investigate a bit > more.. >
Confirmed, there is no difference between those two interfaces other than the bInterfaceSubClass code. Regards, Daniele > Thanks, > Daniele > >> >> Bjørn
