On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:22:56PM +0200, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 16:16:12 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote: > > Send Layer 2 Update frame from the 802.11 code in kernel to the netdev > > that the STA is bound to. If the STA is bound to another VLAN netdev, > > send another update frame. This fixes an issue in which a local bridge > > table was not updated when hostapd sent this frame. > > I hope someone is going to describe why is this necessary and why it > cannot be done in a less hackish way. Otherwise, I'd probably tend to > ask for reverting this patch.
Which part do you think is hackish here? Sending the layer 2 update frame or moving it to kernel? -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
