From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 23:18:20 +0530
> @@ -120,9 +120,10 @@ static int sni_82596_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> netdevice->dev_addr[5] = readb(eth_addr + 0x06);
> iounmap(eth_addr);
>
> - if (!netdevice->irq) {
> + if (netdevice->irq <= 0) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: IRQ not found for i82596 at 0x%lx\n",
> __FILE__, netdevice->base_addr);
> + retval = netdevice->irq ? netdevice->irq : -ENODEV;
> goto probe_failed;
> }
Ok, thinking about this some more...
It is impossible to use platform_get_irq() without every single call
site having this funny:
ret = val ? val : -ENODEV;
sequence.
This is unnecessary duplication and it is also error prone, so I
really think this logic belongs in platform_get_irq() itself. It can
convert '0' to -ENODEV and that way we need no special logic in the
callers at all.
