On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:07 AM, David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com> wrote: > From: Linus Torvalds >> Sent: 29 November 2017 02:29 >> >> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Tobin C. Harding <m...@tobin.cc> wrote: >> > >> > Let's add specifier %px as a >> > clear, opt-in, way to print a pointer and maintain some level of >> > isolation from all the other hex integer output within the Kernel. >> >> Yes, I like this model. It's easy and it's obvious ("'x' for hex"), >> and it gives people a good way to say "yes, I really want the actual >> address as hex" for if/when the hashed pointer doesn't work for some >> reason. > > Remind me to change every %p to %px on kernels that support it. > > Although the absolute values of pointers may not be useful, knowing > that two pointer differ by a small amount is useful. > It is also useful to know whether pointers are to stack, code, static > data or heap. > > This change to %p is going to make debugging a nightmare.
In the future, maybe we could have a knob: unhashed, hashed (default), or zeroed. -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security