From: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:02:05 +0100
> Does this mean you think the general idea of an extended interface > for 64-bit timestamps is useful for traditional packet sockets? I > think that was still an open question, though we seem to be getting > closer to consensus on the implementation and the interface that it > should use if we want it. If it can be done reasonably easy, which you patches seem to indicate is the case, I have no objections to extending packet socket for 64-bit timestamps. I hope that AF_CAPTURE will be designed in such a way that all apps can migrate to it, and I will be making sure it is implemented appropriately with that in mind. But I don't think AF_CAPTURE should block your work here.
