On 11/19/17 2:16 AM, Arkadi Sharshevsky wrote: > > > On 11/18/2017 09:19 PM, David Ahern wrote: >> On 11/14/17 9:18 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >>> From: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arka...@mellanox.com> >>> >>> Connect current dpipe tables to resources. The tables are connected >>> in the following fashion: >>> 1. IPv4 host - KVD hash single >>> 2. IPv6 host - KVD hash double >>> 3. Adjacency - KVD linear >> >> Those descriptions would be helpful to the user. A description attribute >> for the resources? >> > > As described in the cover letter this resources are used by the > majority of the ASICs lookup processes. So currently there is one > to one mapping but is should increase as more tables are exposed, > so I don't think its a good idea to maintain such an attribute. >
'IPv4 host' yes, but I mean the term 'KVD hash single'? Is it the same across all h/w vendors? I have only seen that in the context of MLX. If it is a MLX term then a description to the user that KVD hash single == IPv4 host is warranted.
