On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 15:43:29 +0900
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +TRACE_EVENT(tcp_set_state,
> > + TP_PROTO(struct sock *sk, int oldstate, int newstate),
> > + TP_ARGS(sk, oldstate, newstate),
> > +
> > + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > + __field(__be32, dst)
> > + __field(__be32, src)
> > + __field(__u16, dport)
> > + __field(__u16, sport)
> > + __field(int, oldstate)
> > + __field(int, newstate)
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_fast_assign(
> > + if (oldstate == TCP_TIME_WAIT) {
> > + __entry->dst = inet_twsk(sk)->tw_daddr;
> > + __entry->src = inet_twsk(sk)->tw_rcv_saddr;
> > + __entry->dport = ntohs(inet_twsk(sk)->tw_dport);
> > + __entry->sport = ntohs(inet_twsk(sk)->tw_sport);
> > + } else if (oldstate == TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV) {
> > + __entry->dst = inet_rsk(inet_reqsk(sk))->ir_rmt_addr;
> > + __entry->src = inet_rsk(inet_reqsk(sk))->ir_loc_addr;
> > + __entry->dport =
> > + ntohs(inet_rsk(inet_reqsk(sk))->ir_rmt_port);
> > + __entry->sport = inet_rsk(inet_reqsk(sk))->ir_num;
> > + } else {
> > + __entry->dst = inet_sk(sk)->inet_daddr;
> > + __entry->src = inet_sk(sk)->inet_rcv_saddr;
> > + __entry->dport = ntohs(inet_sk(sk)->inet_dport);
> > + __entry->sport = ntohs(inet_sk(sk)->inet_sport);
> > + }
> > +
> > + __entry->oldstate = oldstate;
> > + __entry->newstate = newstate;
> > + ),
> > +
> > + TP_printk("%08X:%04X %08X:%04X, %02x %02x",
> > + __entry->src, __entry->sport, __entry->dst, __entry->dport,
> > + __entry->oldstate, __entry->newstate)
>
> direct %x of state is not allowed.
> This has to use show_tcp_state_name() like it's done in trace_tcp_set_state
Hmm, I need to look at trace_tcp_set_state. I'm guessing it is in
net-next too?
>
> Also I'm missing the reason to introduce another tracepoint
> that looks just like trace_tcp_set_state.
I want to make sure that perf and trace-cmd can parse the TP_printk(),
if it is having helper functions like that in the TP_printk() part,
then the libtraceevent needs to be aware of that.
-- Steve
