"Tobin C. Harding" <m...@tobin.cc> writes: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:10:56PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> "Tobin C. Harding" <m...@tobin.cc> writes: > [snip] > > Hi Michael, > > I'm working an adding support for ppc64 to leaking_addresses.pl, I've > added the kernel address regular expression that you suggested.
Thanks! > I'd like to add the false positive for vsyscall addresses. Excuse my > ignorance but does PowerPC use a constant address range for vsyscall like > x86_64 > does? The ppc64 machine I have access to does not output anything for > > $ cat /proc/PID/tasks/PID/smaps or > $ cat /proc/PID/tasks/PID/maps No we only have the vdso style vsyscall, which is mapped at user addresses and is subject to ASLR, so you shouldn't need to worry about it. cheers