"Tobin C. Harding" <m...@tobin.cc> writes:

> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:10:56PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> "Tobin C. Harding" <m...@tobin.cc> writes:
> [snip]
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I'm working an adding support for ppc64 to leaking_addresses.pl, I've
> added the kernel address regular expression that you suggested.

Thanks!

> I'd like to add the false positive for vsyscall addresses. Excuse my
> ignorance but does PowerPC use a constant address range for vsyscall like 
> x86_64
> does? The ppc64 machine I have access to does not output anything for
>
>       $ cat /proc/PID/tasks/PID/smaps         or
>       $ cat /proc/PID/tasks/PID/maps

No we only have the vdso style vsyscall, which is mapped at user
addresses and is subject to ASLR, so you shouldn't need to worry about
it.

cheers

Reply via email to