From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.du...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 08:54:20 -0800
> Are we really going to be so strict about the reverse xmas-tree that > we won't allow for assignment w/ variable declaration because the > dependency order won't fit into that format? Yes. > Last I knew this kind of setup was an exception to the reverse > xmas-tree layout requirement because in this case 'p' relies on 'v' so > we can't reorder these without having to kick the assignment of 'p' > off onto a line by itself. Please just declare the variable naked without the assignment and do the assignment down in the code.
