I did mean RSSI - just about anything that when interpreted as an 8 bit
unsigned int and goes up with increasing signal fits the bill as an RSSI
measure. RCPI requires a certain minimum accuracy and linearity (the
accuracy required is not very high).

Simon


-----Original Message-----
From: Johannes Berg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 12:02 AM
To: Simon Barber
Cc: Dan Williams; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Jean Tourrilhes
Subject: RE: proposal for new wireless configuration API

On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 09:42 -0700, Simon Barber wrote:
> The spec for RSSI is very loose - RSSI is just a 8 bit unsigned 
> number, guaranteed to be a monotonically increasing function of signal
strength.
> You don't get to know anything about the scale, or linearity of the 
> function. In essence RSSI is a vendor specific value, of no known
units.
> Not very useful unless you know some card specific details to help 
> interpret it.

Yeah, if you knew at least linearity it'd be more useful.

> Now some cards return a signal strength in dBm as the RSSI - note that

> this fits the requirements of a RSSI measure just fine. RCPI is simply

> a
                                  ^^^^
did you mean to write RCPI there?

> more tightly specified signal strength measure.

Ah, ok. Yes, I think we almost know how to make the bcm card report dBm
instead.

johannes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to