Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
Just curious, why do we have an unconditional #define in netdevice.h for
HAVE_TX_TIMEOUT, and some drivers (e.g. xirc2ps_cs) using it
conditionally as if it might be disabled on some builds?
There are other similar defines in netdevice.h too.
Ancient back-compat defines, for 2.2-era, pre-softnet code where
tx_timeout did not exist.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
