On Wednesday 16 August 2006 05:54, Larry Finger wrote: > Using vanilla wireless-2.6 from Linville's tree as updated today, I > get a warning generated by the statement > if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled())) > in kernel.lockdep.c. This warning only occurs when my wireless > interface is inserted and bcm43xx-softmac is activated. For that > reason I have included the SoftMAC and bcm43xx messages. > > kernel: SoftMAC: sent association request! > kernel: SoftMAC: associated! > kernel: bcm43xx: set security called, .active_key = 0, .level = 2, > .enabled = 1, .encrypt = 1 > kernel: bcm43xx: set security called, .enabled = 1, .encrypt = 1 > kernel: BUG: warning at kernel/lockdep.c:1801/trace_hardirqs_on() > kernel: [<c0103da7>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x197/0x1c0 > kernel: [<c01052db>] show_trace+0x1b/0x20 > kernel: [<c0105306>] dump_stack+0x26/0x30 > kernel: [<c013596f>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x17f/0x190 > kernel: [<c0104a15>] do_general_protection+0xc5/0x230 > kernel: [<c01034b1>] error_code+0x39/0x40 > kernel: [<000038c7>] 0x38c7 > kernel: [<c01052db>] show_trace+0x1b/0x20 > kernel: [<c0105306>] dump_stack+0x26/0x30 > kernel: [<c013596f>] trace_hardirqs_on+0x17f/0x190 > kernel: [<c0104a15>] do_general_protection+0xc5/0x230 > kernel: [<c01034b1>] error_code+0x39/0x40 > > I'm at a loss here. Can anyone explain how to interpret this dump? I > think I see a general protection fault, but what to do from there is a > mystery.
Hm, weird bug. I can't reproduce this on i386 or PPC. Could it be a bug in the lockdep code? -- Greetings Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
