On Sun, 2017-10-22 at 21:31 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 13:28 +0900, Koichiro Den wrote: > > > Indeed, meaning that tcp_clean_rtx_queue implementation never takes. > > But for me it seems that there is some possibility RACK algorithm will take > > it. > > As long as tp->tcp_mstamp is monotonically increasing (and it is ;) ), > RACK will behave properly. > > I am not sure we need to discuss this forever frankly ;) > > > Yeah, sure, thanks for your time and helpful comments.
- Re: [net-next] tcp: do tcp_mstamp_refresh before retransmits ... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [net-next] tcp: do tcp_mstamp_refresh before retransmits ... Koichiro Den
- Re: [net-next] tcp: do tcp_mstamp_refresh before retrans... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [net-next] tcp: do tcp_mstamp_refresh before ret... Koichiro Den
- Re: [net-next] tcp: do tcp_mstamp_refresh before... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [net-next] tcp: do tcp_mstamp_refresh be... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [net-next] tcp: do tcp_mstamp_refre... Koichiro Den
- Re: [net-next] tcp: do tcp_mstamp_refre... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [net-next] tcp: do tcp_mstamp_refre... Koichiro Den
- Re: [net-next] tcp: do tcp_mstamp_refre... Eric Dumazet
- Re: [net-next] tcp: do tcp_mstamp_refre... Koichiro Den
