On Sun, 2017-10-22 at 21:31 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 13:28 +0900, Koichiro Den wrote:
> 
> > Indeed, meaning that tcp_clean_rtx_queue implementation never takes.
> > But for me it seems that there is some possibility RACK algorithm will take
> > it.
> 
> As long as tp->tcp_mstamp is monotonically increasing (and it is ;) ),
> RACK will behave properly.
> 
> I am not sure we need to discuss this forever frankly ;)
>  
> 
> 
Yeah, sure, thanks for your time and helpful comments.

Reply via email to