On 10/19/2017 09:54 PM, Mario Hüttel wrote:
On 10/19/2017 08:35 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
We already have this 'dsample-point' implemented in the ip tool:
$ ip link set vcan0 type can help
Usage: ip link set DEVICE type can
[ bitrate BITRATE [ sample-point SAMPLE-POINT] ] |
[ tq TQ prop-seg PROP_SEG phase-seg1 PHASE-SEG1
phase-seg2 PHASE-SEG2 [ sjw SJW ] ]
[ dbitrate BITRATE [ dsample-point SAMPLE-POINT] ] | <<-- here!
[ dtq TQ dprop-seg PROP_SEG dphase-seg1 PHASE-SEG1
dphase-seg2 PHASE-SEG2 [ dsjw SJW ] ]
But AFAIK m_can is not using that value in m_can_set_bittiming().
Actually I need some clarification. The sample point of the can core is
between the two time segments.
I always thought that the "sample point" options of the ip tool are used
in the internal
calculation of the two timing segments and is therefore no individual value.
You are right.
See picture at http://www.bittiming.can-wiki.info/
Usually you can give the bitrate and the sample point (which is at 75%
aka 0.750 by default) and then the kernel-internal bitrate calculating
algorithm calculates the tq prop-seg phase-seg1 phase-seg2 stuff.
Alternatively you can provide the tq prop-seg phase-seg1 phase-seg2
stuff on your own which is set to the CAN controller registers then.
For that reason my remark "m_can is not using that value" was wrong as
m_can just uses the tq prop-seg phase-seg1 phase-seg2 stuff - either
from the bitrate calculation or provided by the user.
Thanks for the question ;-)
Best,
Oliver
