In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through" comment
on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
---
This code was tested by compilation only (GCC 7.2.0 was used).
net/9p/trans_xen.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/9p/trans_xen.c b/net/9p/trans_xen.c
index 6ad3e04..7ec5df9 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_xen.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_xen.c
@@ -510,7 +510,8 @@ static void xen_9pfs_front_changed(struct xenbus_device
*dev,
case XenbusStateClosed:
if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed)
break;
- /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */
+ /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state */
+ /* fall through */
case XenbusStateClosing:
xenbus_frontend_closed(dev);
break;
--
2.7.4
