On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 05:55:27PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
>>
>> The use of the | operator always leads to true on the expression
>> (rt->rt6i_flags | RTF_CACHE) which looks rather suspect to me. I
>> believe this is fixed by using & instead to just check the
>> RTF_CACHE entry bit.
> Good catch. LGTM. If rt does not have RTF_CACHE set, it should not be in the
> exception table.
>
> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <ka...@fb.com>
>
Thanks a lot for catching this. Yes. It should have been '&' instead of '|'.
Acked-by: Wei Wang <wei...@google.com>
>>
>> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1457747 ("Wrong operator used")
>>
>> Fixes: 35732d01fe31 ("ipv6: introduce a hash table to store dst cache")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
>> ---
>> net/ipv6/route.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
>> index 6db1541eaa7b..0556d1ee189c 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
>> @@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@ int rt6_remove_exception_rt(struct rt6_info *rt)
>> int err;
>>
>> if (!from ||
>> - !(rt->rt6i_flags | RTF_CACHE))
>> + !(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_CACHE))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> if (!rcu_access_pointer(from->rt6i_exception_bucket))
>> --
>> 2.14.1
>>
