On 04/10/17 03:32, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The name ipv4v6_shared is longer than it needs to be maybe ip or ip_common Well ip_common sounds nice.
But I don't fully understand what this means for the current situation. I could do a v2, but would that make any sense since Dave and Eric already said "no" to the whole concept. Would it change anything to keep the tcp directory in net/ipv4/ (only 1/3 and 2/3)?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
