On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 18:03:49 -0700 > Mahesh Bandewar <mah...@bandewar.net> wrote: > >> From: Mahesh Bandewar <mahe...@google.com> >> >> Some NIC drivers don't have correct speed/duplex settings at the >> time they send NETDEV_UP notification and that messes up the >> bonding state. Especially 802.3ad mode which is very sensitive >> to these settings. In the current implementation we invoke >> bond_update_speed_duplex() when we receive NETDEV_UP, however, >> ignore the return value. If the values we get are invalid >> (UNKNOWN), then slave gets removed from the aggregator with >> speed and duplex set to UNKNOWN while link is still marked as UP. >> >> This patch fixes this scenario. Also 802.3ad mode is sensitive to >> these conditions while other modes are not, so making sure that it >> doesn't change the behavior for other modes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Bandewar <mahe...@google.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 11 ++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >> b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >> index b7313c1d9dcd..177be373966b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c >> @@ -3076,7 +3076,16 @@ static int bond_slave_netdev_event(unsigned long >> event, >> break; >> case NETDEV_UP: >> case NETDEV_CHANGE: >> - bond_update_speed_duplex(slave); >> + /* For 802.3ad mode only: >> + * Getting invalid Speed/Duplex values here will put slave >> + * in weird state. So mark it as link-down for the time >> + * being and let link-monitoring (miimon) set it right when >> + * correct speeds/duplex are available. >> + */ >> + if (bond_update_speed_duplex(slave) && >> + BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) >> + slave->link = BOND_LINK_DOWN; >> + >> if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) >> bond_3ad_adapter_speed_duplex_changed(slave); >> /* Fallthrough */ > > Then fix the drivers. Trying to workaround it here isn't helping. > This is not a workaround. It avoids bonding state being weird.
> The problem is that miimon is not required. Bonding can be purely > event driven. > really? Here is a code-snippet from bonding itself - /* reset values for 802.3ad/TLB/ALB */ if (!bond_mode_uses_arp(bond_mode)) { if (!miimon) { pr_warn("Warning: miimon must be specified, otherwise bonding will not detect link failure, speed and duplex which are essential for 802.3ad operation\n"); pr_warn("Forcing miimon to 100msec\n"); miimon = BOND_DEFAULT_MIIMON; } }