On September 26, 2017 8:13:21 AM PDT, Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> wrote: >On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Tariq Toukan <tar...@mellanox.com> >wrote: >> >> >> On 26/09/2017 3:51 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Tariq Toukan <tar...@mellanox.com> >wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Eric, >>>> >>>> We see a regression introduced in this series, specifically in the >>>> patches >>>> touching lib/kobject_uevent.c. >>>> We tried to figure out what is wrong there, but couldn't point it >out. >>>> >>>> Bug is that mlx4 driver restart fails, because mlx4_core is still >in use. >>>> According to module dependencies, both mlx4_en and mlx4_ib should >have >>>> been >>>> unloaded at this point >>>> Please see log below. >>>> >>>> This looks to be some kind of a race, as the repro is not >deterministic. >>>> Probably the en/ib modules are now mistakenly reloaded. >>>> >>>> Any idea what could this be? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Tariq >>>> >>>> >>>> [root@reg-l-vrt-41016-009 ~]# /etc/init.d/openibd stop >>>> Unloading HCA driver: [ OK ] >>>> [root@reg-l-vrt-41016-009 ~]# /etc/init.d/openibd start >>>> Loading HCA driver and Access Layer: [ OK ] >>>> [root@reg-l-vrt-41016-009 ~]# /etc/init.d/openibd stop >>>> Unloading mlx4_core [FAILED] >>>> rmmod: ERROR: Module mlx4_core is in use >>> >>> I have absolutely no idea. Please bisect. >> >> We previously saw a similar issue, that was reported in mailing list. >> Dmitry Torokhov suggested the following fix: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/12/523 >> >> And indeed, it solved the issue. >> >> We kept the suggested patch in our internal branch, and rebased. >> Issue appeared again once your series was accepted. >> >> By bisecting, we see that the issue re-appears in this patch: >> 4a336a23d619 kobject: copy env blob in one go >> >>> >>> Are you really using netns in the first place ? >> >> No. But seems like it still affects the modules load/unload. >> >> Regards, >> Tariq > >Ah this makes sense now. > >Dmitry Torokhov hack breaks the assumption I used in my patch. > >Since it is not upstream yet, I believe that it will need more work >before being in a proper state.
It is in Greg's tree where all kobject patches should go through as far as I know. Thanks. -- Dmitry