On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.ker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
> <mahe...@google.com> wrote:
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_TUN_VNET_CROSS_LE
>>>  static inline bool tun_legacy_is_little_endian(struct tun_struct *tun)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -541,6 +604,11 @@ static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool 
>>> clean)
>>>
>>>         tun = rtnl_dereference(tfile->tun);
>>>
>>> +       if (tun && clean) {
>>> +               tun_napi_disable(tun, tfile);
>> are we missing synchronize_net() separating disable and del calls?
>
> That is not needed here. napi_disable has its own mechanism for waiting
> until a napi struct is no longer run. netif_napi_del will call synchronize_net
> if needed.
Yes, that will do. Thanks.

> These two calls are made one after the other in quite a few drivers.

Reply via email to