Hi Egil,

Egil Hjelmeland <pri...@egil-hjelmeland.no> writes:

> Prepare for next patch:
> Move tag setup from lan9303_separate_ports() to new function
> lan9303_setup_tagging()
>
> Signed-off-by: Egil Hjelmeland <pri...@egil-hjelmeland.no>

Minor styling issues, otherwise LGTM:

Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com>

> +/* forward special tagged packets from port 0 to port 1 *or* port 2 */
> +static int lan9303_setup_tagging(struct lan9303 *chip)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +     /* enable defining the destination port via special VLAN tagging
> +      * for port 0
> +      */
> +     ret = lan9303_write_switch_reg(chip, LAN9303_SWE_INGRESS_PORT_TYPE,
> +                                    LAN9303_SWE_INGRESS_PORT_TYPE_VLAN);
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     /* tag incoming packets at port 1 and 2 on their way to port 0 to be
> +      * able to discover their source port
> +      */
> +     return lan9303_write_switch_reg(
> +             chip, LAN9303_BM_EGRSS_PORT_TYPE,
> +             LAN9303_BM_EGRSS_PORT_TYPE_SPECIAL_TAG_PORT0);

Please avoid this kind of alignment as much as possible.

    u32 val = LAN9303_BM_EGRSS_PORT_TYPE_SPECIAL_TAG_PORT0;

would do the trick for the +80 chars issue.

BTW, it'd be great to see sometime soon a cleanup patch which makes use
of such temporary u32 val variable for most of the
lan9303_write_switch_reg and lan9303_write_switch_port calls. ;-)


Thanks,

        Vivien

Reply via email to