From: Craig Gallek <kraigatg...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:16:13 -0400
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Daniel Mack <dan...@zonque.org> wrote: >> On 09/19/2017 10:55 PM, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Craig Gallek <kraigatg...@gmail.com> >>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:30:54 -0400 >>> >>>> This was previously left as a TODO. Add the implementation and >>>> extend the test to cover it. >>> >>> Series applied, thanks. >>> >> >> Hmm, I think these patches need some more discussion regarding the IM >> nodes handling, see the reply I sent an hour ago. Could you wait for >> that before pushing your tree? > > I can follow up with a patch to implement your suggestion. It's > really just an efficiency improvement, though, so I think it's ok to > handle independently. (Sorry, I haven't had a chance to play with the > implementation details yet). Sorry, I thought the core implementation had been agreed upon and the series was OK. All that was asked for were simplifications and/or optimization which could be done via follow-up patches. It's already pushed out to my tree, so I would need to do a real revert. I hope that won't be necessary.
