On Sun, 2017-09-17 at 16:27 +0000, Jon Maloy wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Meyer [mailto:tho...@m3y3r.de] [] > > What about the other binary search implementation in the same file? Should > > I try to convert it it will it get NAKed for performance reasons too? > > The searches for inserting and removing publications is less time critical, > so that would be ok with me. > If you have any more general interest in improving the code in this file > (which is needed) it would also be appreciated.
Perhaps using an rbtree would be an improvement.
