On a linksys E1200v1 (actually a crossflashed E1000v2), the offloading features 
give no measurable benefit to speed or latency. Furthermore, disabling GRO 
actually improves iperf performance by a whoppimg 3mbps. Results:

Currently:

[  4] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.100 port 52410
[ ID] Interval        Transfer    Bandwidth       Reads   Dist(bin=16.0K)
[  4] 0.00-10.02 sec  52.4 MBytes  43.8 Mbits/sec  641    75:181:12:1:1:0:0:371
[  5] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.100 port 52412
[  5] 0.00-10.02 sec  52.4 MBytes  43.8 Mbits/sec  629    51:194:13:1:0:1:0:369
[  4] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.100 port 52414
[  4] 0.00-10.02 sec  51.9 MBytes  43.4 Mbits/sec  695    126:203:1:0:0:0:2:363
[  5] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.100 port 52416
[  5] 0.00-10.01 sec  52.4 MBytes  43.9 Mbits/sec  626    57:186:10:0:0:0:0:373
[  4] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.100 port 52420
[  4] 0.00-10.02 sec  52.4 MBytes  43.8 Mbits/sec  605    36:179:16:1:0:1:0:372
[  5] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.100 port 52422

After disabling everything - including GRO:

[  4] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.100 port 52440
[ ID] Interval        Transfer    Bandwidth       Reads   Dist(bin=16.0K)
[  4] 0.00-10.01 sec  55.1 MBytes  46.2 Mbits/sec  672    180:82:0:0:1:0:0:409
[  5] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.100 port 52442
[  5] 0.00-10.01 sec  56.0 MBytes  46.9 Mbits/sec  636    117:96:0:0:1:0:0:422
[  4] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.100 port 52444
[  4] 0.00-10.01 sec  55.4 MBytes  46.4 Mbits/sec  675    172:92:0:0:1:0:0:410
[  5] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.100 port 52446
[  5] 0.00-10.01 sec  56.0 MBytes  46.9 Mbits/sec  633    119:90:0:1:1:0:0:422
[  4] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.100 port 52448
[  4] 0.00-10.01 sec  55.2 MBytes  46.3 Mbits/sec  688    157:123:0:0:2:0:0:406

v2: Changed napi_gro_receive to netif_receive_skb. Seems to have an identical 
result.

Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <ros...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
index 48d672b204a4..1fb0053aeee7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
@@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static int bgmac_dma_rx_read(struct bgmac *bgmac, struct 
bgmac_dma_ring *ring,
                        skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, bgmac->net_dev);
                        bgmac->net_dev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
                        bgmac->net_dev->stats.rx_packets++;
-                       napi_gro_receive(&bgmac->napi, skb);
+                       netif_receive_skb(skb);
                        handled++;
                } while (0);
 
-- 
2.13.5

Reply via email to