On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 02:49:20PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Phil Sutter
> > Sent: 01 September 2017 17:53
> > By making use of strncpy(), both implementations are really simple so
> > there is no need to add libbsd as additional dependency.
> >
> ...
> > +
> > +size_t strlcpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t size)
> > +{
> > + if (size) {
> > + strncpy(dst, src, size - 1);
> > + dst[size - 1] = '\0';
> > + }
> > + return strlen(src);
> > +}
>
> Except that isn't really strlcpy().
> Better would be:
> len = strlen(src) + 1;
> if (len <= size)
> memcpy(dst, src, len);
> else if (size) {
> dst[size - 1] = 0;
> memcpy(dst, src, size - 1);
> }
> return len - 1;
Please elaborate: Why isn't my version "really" strlcpy()? Why is your
proposed version better?
Thanks, Phil
