On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:15:39PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote: > With the current code, when vsock_dequeue_accept() is removing a sock > from the list, nothing prevents vsock_enqueue_accept() from adding a new > sock into the list concurrently. We should add a lock to protect the list.
The listener sock is locked, preventing concurrent modification. I have checked both the virtio and vmci transports. Can you post an example where the listener sock isn't locked? Stefan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
