On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Liping Zhang <zlpnob...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-08-16 7:35 GMT+08:00 Pravin Shelar <pshe...@ovn.org>: > [...] >>> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/actions.c b/net/openvswitch/actions.c >>> index e4610676299b..f849ef52853f 100644 >>> --- a/net/openvswitch/actions.c >>> +++ b/net/openvswitch/actions.c >>> @@ -921,6 +921,7 @@ static int output_userspace(struct datapath *dp, struct >>> sk_buff *skb, >>> /* Include actions. */ >>> upcall.actions = actions; >>> upcall.actions_len = actions_len; >>> + upcall.actions_attrlen = OVS_CB(skb)->acts_origlen; >> OVS_CB acts_origlen should be accessible in upcall_msg_size (), is >> there reason to add this member to struct dp_upcall_info? > > Hmm... this means we should add an extra parameter to the upcall_msg_size() > function, i.e.: > static size_t upcall_msg_size(const struct dp_upcall_info *upcall_info, > - unsigned int hdrlen) > + unsigned int hdrlen, int actions_attrlen) > I am fine with the parameter.
Thanks.