Back in the days when RTM_NEWLINK wasn't yet implemented, people had to
rely upon kernel modules to create (virtual) interfaces for them. The
number of those was usually defined via module parameter, and a sane
default value was chosen. Now that iproute2 allows users to instantiate
new interfaces at will, this is no longer required - though for
backwards compatibility reasons, we're stuck with both methods which
collide at the point when one tries to create an interface with a
standard name for a type which exists in a kernel module: The kernel
will load the module, which instantiates the interface and the following
RTM_NEWLINK request will fail since the interface exists already. For
instance:

| # lsmod | grep dummy
| # ip link show | grep dummy0
| # ip link add dummy0 type dummy
| RTNETLINK answers: File exists
| # ip link show | grep -c dummy0
| 1

There is no race-free solution in userspace for this dilemma as far as I
can tell, so try to detect whether a user might have run into this and
notify that the given error message might be irrelevant.

Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <p...@nwl.cc>
---
 ip/iplink.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/ip/iplink.c b/ip/iplink.c
index 5aff2fde38dae..f94fa96668d21 100644
--- a/ip/iplink.c
+++ b/ip/iplink.c
@@ -867,6 +867,33 @@ int iplink_parse(int argc, char **argv, struct iplink_req 
*req,
        return ret - argc;
 }
 
+static bool link_name_is_standard(const char *type, const char *name)
+{
+       const struct {
+               const char *type;
+               const char *name;
+       } standard_links[] = {
+               { "dummy", "dummy0" },
+               { "ifb", "ifb0" },
+               { "ifb", "ifb1" },
+               { "bond", "bond0" },
+               { "ipip", "tunl0" },
+               { "gre", "gre0" },
+               { "gretap", "gretap0" },
+               { "vti", "ip_vti0" },
+               { "sit", "sit0" },
+       };
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(standard_links); i++) {
+               if (strcmp(type, standard_links[i].type) ||
+                   strcmp(name, standard_links[i].name))
+                       continue;
+               return true;
+       }
+       return false;
+}
+
 static int iplink_modify(int cmd, unsigned int flags, int argc, char **argv)
 {
        int len;
@@ -1007,8 +1034,14 @@ static int iplink_modify(int cmd, unsigned int flags, 
int argc, char **argv)
                return -1;
        }
 
-       if (rtnl_talk(&rth, &req.n, NULL, 0) < 0)
+       if (rtnl_talk(&rth, &req.n, NULL, 0) < 0) {
+               if (errno == EEXIST &&
+                   flags & NLM_F_CREATE &&
+                   link_name_is_standard(type, name))
+                       fprintf(stderr,
+                               "Note: Kernel might have created interface upon 
module load.\n");
                return -2;
+       }
 
        return 0;
 }
-- 
2.13.1

Reply via email to