On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:40:50 -0700 Amritha Nambiar <amritha.namb...@intel.com> wrote: The concept is fine, bu t the code looks different than the rest which is never a good sign.
> + if ((argc > 0) && (matches(*argv, "tc") == 0)) {
Extra () are unnecessary in compound conditional.
> + tc = atoi(*argv);
Prefer using strtoul since it has better error handling than atoi()
> + argc--;
> + argv++;
> + }
Use NEXT_ARG() construct like rest of the code.
