On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:40:23 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> [ +Martin ]
Sorry, I thought I CCed Martin.
> On 07/24/2017 11:22 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > To read translated and jited instructions from the kernel,
> > one has to set certain pointers of struct bpf_prog_info to
> > pre-allocated user buffers. Unfortunately, the existing
> > bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd() helper zeros struct bpf_prog_info
> > before passing it to the kernel.
> >
> > Keeping the zeroing seems like a good idea in general, since
> > kernel will check if the structure was zeroed. Add a new
> > helper for those more advanced users who can be trusted to
> > take care of zeroing themselves.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com>
> > ---
> > I'm happy to change the name of the new function.
> >
> > tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> > index 412a7c82995a..2703fa282b65 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> > @@ -308,13 +308,12 @@ int bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(__u32 id)
> > return sys_bpf(BPF_MAP_GET_FD_BY_ID, &attr, sizeof(attr));
> > }
> >
> > -int bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(int prog_fd, void *info, __u32 *info_len)
> > +int __bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(int prog_fd, void *info, __u32 *info_len)
> > {
> > union bpf_attr attr;
> > int err;
> >
> > bzero(&attr, sizeof(attr));
> > - bzero(info, *info_len);
>
> Looks a bit unintentional to me, e.g. 95b9afd3987f ("bpf: Test for bpf
> ID") did set up pointers in test_bpf_obj_id(), but later only checked
> for the {jited,xlated}_prog_len.
>
> Clearing out the pointers looks not to useful. Lets just push the need
> for bzero() to call-sites in general in this case.
Should I target this at net then? To avoid backwards compatibility
issues?
