Roland/Sean, I'll fix all these and retest, then resubmit...
Comments below... Steve. On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 11:11 -0700, Sean Hefty wrote: > Steve Wise wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c > > index d294bbc..83f84ef 100644 > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c > > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include <linux/mutex.h> > > #include <linux/inetdevice.h> > > #include <linux/workqueue.h> > > #include <linux/if_arp.h> > > +#include <linux/inetdevice.h> > > File is included 3 lines up. > Oops. I'll fix this. > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cache.c > > b/drivers/infiniband/core/cache.c > > index e05ca2c..061858c 100644 > > #include <linux/module.h> > > #include <linux/errno.h> > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > -#include <linux/sched.h> /* INIT_WORK, schedule_work(), > > flush_scheduled_work() */ > > I'm guessing that the include isn't currently needed, since none of the other > changes to the file should have removed its dependency. Should this be put > into > a separate patch? > And this. > > +static int iw_conn_req_handler(struct iw_cm_id *cm_id, > > + struct iw_cm_event *iw_event) > > +{ > > + struct rdma_cm_id *new_cm_id; > > + struct rdma_id_private *listen_id, *conn_id; > > + struct sockaddr_in *sin; > > + struct net_device *dev = NULL; > > + int ret; > > + > > + listen_id = cm_id->context; > > + atomic_inc(&listen_id->dev_remove); > > + if (!cma_comp(listen_id, CMA_LISTEN)) { > > + ret = -ECONNABORTED; > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > + /* Create a new RDMA id for the new IW CM ID */ > > + new_cm_id = rdma_create_id(listen_id->id.event_handler, > > + listen_id->id.context, > > + RDMA_PS_TCP); > > + if (!new_cm_id) { > > + ret = -ENOMEM; > > + goto out; > > + } > > + conn_id = container_of(new_cm_id, struct rdma_id_private, id); > > + atomic_inc(&conn_id->dev_remove); > > This is not released in error cases. See below. > > > + conn_id->state = CMA_CONNECT; > > + > > + dev = ip_dev_find(iw_event->local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr); > > + if (!dev) { > > + ret = -EADDRNOTAVAIL; > > cma_release_remove(conn_id); > > > + rdma_destroy_id(new_cm_id); > > + goto out; > > + } > > + ret = rdma_copy_addr(&conn_id->id.route.addr.dev_addr, dev, NULL); > > + if (ret) { > > cma_release_remove(conn_id); > > > + rdma_destroy_id(new_cm_id); > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > + ret = cma_acquire_dev(conn_id); > > + if (ret) { > > cma_release_remove(conn_id); > I'll fix these too. > > + rdma_destroy_id(new_cm_id); > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > + conn_id->cm_id.iw = cm_id; > > + cm_id->context = conn_id; > > + cm_id->cm_handler = cma_iw_handler; > > + > > + sin = (struct sockaddr_in *) &new_cm_id->route.addr.src_addr; > > + *sin = iw_event->local_addr; > > + sin = (struct sockaddr_in *) &new_cm_id->route.addr.dst_addr; > > + *sin = iw_event->remote_addr; > > + > > + ret = cma_notify_user(conn_id, RDMA_CM_EVENT_CONNECT_REQUEST, 0, > > + iw_event->private_data, > > + iw_event->private_data_len); > > + if (ret) { > > + /* User wants to destroy the CM ID */ > > + conn_id->cm_id.iw = NULL; > > + cma_exch(conn_id, CMA_DESTROYING); > > + cma_release_remove(conn_id); > > + rdma_destroy_id(&conn_id->id); > > + } > > + > > +out: > > + if (!dev) > > + dev_put(dev); > > Shouldn't this be: if (dev)? > yup. This was added (incorrecty by me) during the review process... > > + cma_release_remove(listen_id); > > + return ret; > > +} > > @@ -1357,8 +1552,8 @@ static int cma_resolve_loopback(struct r > > ib_addr_set_dgid(&id_priv->id.route.addr.dev_addr, &gid); > > > > if (cma_zero_addr(&id_priv->id.route.addr.src_addr)) { > > - src_in = (struct sockaddr_in *)&id_priv->id.route.addr.src_addr; > > - dst_in = (struct sockaddr_in *)&id_priv->id.route.addr.dst_addr; > > + src_in = (struct sockaddr_in *) > > &id_priv->id.route.addr.src_addr; > > + dst_in = (struct sockaddr_in *) > > &id_priv->id.route.addr.dst_addr; > > trivial spacing change only > right. > > +static inline void iw_addr_get_sgid(struct rdma_dev_addr* rda, > > + union ib_gid *gid) > > +{ > > + memcpy(gid, rda->src_dev_addr, sizeof *gid); > > +} > > + > > +static inline union ib_gid* iw_addr_get_dgid(struct rdma_dev_addr* rda) > > +{ > > + return (union ib_gid *) rda->dst_dev_addr; > > +} > > Minor personal nit: for consistency with the rest of the file, can you use > dev_addr in place of rda? > okay. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html