On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:58:38AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 17:18:06 +0100 > Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > I am implementing userspace access to socket information for AF_VSOCK. > > A few hours into writing and testing a /proc/net/vsock seq_file I > > noticed that ss(8) prefers NETLINK_SOCK_DIAG over procfs. > > > > Before potentially wasting time implementing a legacy interface that > > won't be accepted, I thought it might be good to ask :). > > > > Which approach is preferred? > > 1. New address families must implement only sock_diag. > > 2. Both sock_diag and procfs must be implemented. > > 3. Implement whichever interface you prefer. > > > > Thanks, > > Stefan > > You are correct, I am unlikely to take any new code using /proc > in ss.
Thanks Stephen and David, will switch to sock_diag. Stefan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
