Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> writes: > Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:33:58PM CEST, m...@mojatatu.com wrote: >>Make name consistent with other TC event notification routines. >> >>Signed-off-by: Roman Mashak <m...@mojatatu.com> >>--- >> net/sched/act_api.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >>diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c >>index aed6cf2..f2e9ed3 100644 >>--- a/net/sched/act_api.c >>+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c >>@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ static int tca_get_fill(struct sk_buff *skb, struct >>list_head *actions, >> } >> >> static int >>-act_get_notify(struct net *net, u32 portid, struct nlmsghdr *n, >>+tcf_get_notify(struct net *net, u32 portid, struct nlmsghdr *n, > > Rather call it "tcf_action_get_notify"
We already have tcf_add_notify() and tcf_del_notify() as a common style. > > + net-next is closed if I'm not mistaken
