David Miller wrote: > From: Masahide NAKAMURA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:30:29 +0900 > >> @@ -272,6 +272,9 @@ #define XFRM_TYPE_NON_FRAGMENT 1 >> void (*destructor)(struct xfrm_state *); >> int (*input)(struct xfrm_state *, struct sk_buff >> *skb); >> int (*output)(struct xfrm_state *, struct sk_buff >> *pskb); >> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_ADVANCED >> + int (*reject)(struct xfrm_state *, struct sk_buff >> *skb, struct flowi *); >> +#endif > > xfrm_secpath_reject() unconditionally dereferences this new reject > operation pointer, but this patch contains no assignments of it. > > Please send incremental patches that are fully functional all by > themselves, so that if each one is applied, it would compile and > work.
Thanks, I'll send so next time. -- Masahide NAKAMURA - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
