[RFC PATCH v2 net-next 10/10] selftests/bpf: don't try to access past MAX_PACKET_OFF in test_verifier

[Edward Cree]

"direct packet access: test2" was potentially reading four bytes from
 pkt + 0xffff, which could take it past the verifier's limit, causing
 the program to be rejected.
Increase the shifts by one so that R2 is now mask 0x7fff instead of
 mask 0xffff.

Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ec...@solarflare.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 210a031..7df3c34 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -2330,8 +2330,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
                                    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
                        BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_4),
                        BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
-                       BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_2, 48),
-                       BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_2, 48),
+                       BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_2, 49),
+                       BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_2, 49),
                        BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2),
                        BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3),
                        BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 8),